Utilitarianism is a teleological theory, meaning that it
looks at the consequences of an action to decide whether that action is right
or wrong. It generally relies on the principle of utility, which is a measure
of how useful an action is. Utilitarianism is a relativist system as it does
not provide fixed moral rules however, is flexible in a given situation.
Jeremy Bentham was the founder of utilitarianism in 1789 and
he stated that the principle of utility will help a person to decide whether an
action is good or bad. He believed in quantitative utilitarianism which is “the
greatest good for the greatest number”. In other words, an action is right if
it brings about the greatest good for the majority of people. Bentham was a psychological hedonist; he was
concerned with the role of pleasure and pain in decision making. He used the
hedonic calculus to measure pleasure in terms of intensity, duration, certainty
and extent. Bentham also said that every situation is judged individually and
every action is judged on its own merits (act utilitarianism).
John Stuart Mill developed Bentham’s theory and thought that
searching for basic pleasure was an animal instinct, and that humans are
capable of more than this. He believed in higher and lower pleasures; the higher
pleasures, pleasures of the mind, being things such as education and the lower
pleasures, pleasures of the body, being things such as food (qualitative
utilitarianism). Mill had respect for rules that are formed to benefit society
(rule utilitarianism).
The principle of hedonism (happiness) is very important and
both Bentham and Mill argue that intrinsic good (the only thing that is good in
itself) is happiness or pleasure. This supports the fact that utilitarianism is
relevant in the 21st century because it is echoed in the current
educational climate, where “happiness” has been taught subject in many schools.
Schools are encouraging their students to fulfil their higher pleasures
(pleasures of the mind) in hobbies they offer to them such as different kinds
of sport and art. Bentham is careful to balance out pleasure with pain when
referring to the quantity of happiness that we achieve through our actions. His
utilitarianism promotes selfless acts which discourage selfish acts such as
lying or stealing, therefore it is showing that by choosing to act more morally
with selfless acts we will be creating a better and happier environment for
everyone. What brings humans happiness should be decided by looking at the
consequences of our actions because it keeps everyone in touch with the day to
day matters which is why utilitarianism is relevant in the 21st
century.
The principle of hedonism is a timeless principle as it
reminds us that we should strive to achieve happiness whilst avoiding pain. We
should work towards the greater good and overlook our individual differences.
Bentham said, “The greatest good for the greatest number”. This could be put
into action in governments of the 21st century as it will always
help to satisfy the needs of the majority which is the best thing a government
can hope for in its country. Although
this may seem unfair as the minority is being “forgotten” it is, however,
fairer long-term. If governments strive to make everyone happy all the time, it
will become more likely that no one will end up happy. Utilitarianism brings
about more happiness which is relevant in today’s society. Therefore, Utilitarianism is the only practical ethical
system for governing large groups of people and it provides us with the most
simple, yet powerful, ethical guideline which is to strive for happiness but
only at the same time as minimising pain.
However, utilitarianism can also be seen as not being
relevant to the 21st century because by promoting happiness over
other goods, it reduces morality to being simple. Morality is complex,
challenging and torn between conflicting duties and interests that often bring
about equal amounts of pleasure and pain. This means that there must be some
other way of differentiating between what is considered right and wrong.
Some people may argue that happiness isn’t powerful enough to
make people act in the 21st century. People continue to carry out
actions that cause more overall pain than happiness such as forcing sex on a
person or the abuse and neglect of children. There needs to be punishments in
place to discourage these kinds of actions. Therefore, many would say that
Utilitarianism supports evil by placing the emphasis on the outcomes of an
action rather than the action itself. Also, there must be more to life than
achieving happiness and avoiding pain which therefore must mean that hedonism
seems to go against our common sense.
Overall, I think that utilitarianism is relevant in the 21st
century because it is the only practical ethical system for governing large
groups of people and it provides us with the most simple, yet powerful, ethical
guideline which is to strive for happiness but only at the same time as
minimising pain.
H.D
A great post looking at a few different angles on this - well done! I think there must be some Greek roots to this... anyone who has been in my General RE may be able to contribute?
ReplyDeleteyes, it does have ancient greek roots, from thinkers such as Epicurus
Delete(I'm not an ethics expert I'm afraid!)
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting post. How does Preference Utiliarianism compare in terms of relevance? There are also strong and weak versions of Mill's Rule Utilitarianism - do you think one is more relevan than the other?
ReplyDeleteawesome insight to utilitarianism and the 21St century!
ReplyDeleteInteresting post. Many would argue that Utilitarianism is outdated however your contextual analysis of how it can be applied to the 21st century proves the theory can still be utilised. Is it the best ethical system however? Many would argue that religion offers the best ethical system.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very well reasoned argument, I am very surprised in how UT can be applied to the 21st century as I did not think it could be justified however you have changed my mind! excellent response to the question.
ReplyDeleteWell written and Interesting post. It would be good if you mention Act, Rule and Preference UT.
ReplyDeleteThis has really helped to conclude all of my knowledge on Utilitarianism.
ReplyDeleteWell written, good detail and interesting to read.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting and really helped my knowledge of utilitarianism
ReplyDeleteThis is a very well thought out post with lots of information that has helped me revise my knowladge and conclude my opinion of UT. To add, Bentham once said, "Quantity of pleasure being equal, push-pin (a simple children's game) is as good as poetry." Although he then contradicted himself by saying, "What is good and bad for each person is upto each person to decide." There Bentham will take personal preference into account when making a moral decision through Act UT. (According to my notes).
ReplyDeletethis post was very useful and expanded my knowledge in utilitarianism and helped me to understand it more
ReplyDeletethis helped me put together all th ideas on utilitarianism and helped me summaries what it was all about
ReplyDeleteAn interesting area for utilitarianism in the 21st century is health economics. As a health economist myself, we are charged with maximising the return on health care investments, which means we want to maximise health and use NHS resources as efficiently as possible. We have a framework (delivered by NICE) where 'health' is measured using a metric called the Quality Adjusted Life Year - QALY. If we want to maximise QALYs given a fixed budget, then it's argued by some that we're working within a utilitarian philosophy.
ReplyDeleteYou can find an interesting paper here:
http://pauldolan.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/utilitarianism-and-the-measurement.pdf
I do agree with the writer of this blog because they have put across a very strong analysis which is supported by factual evidence of how utilitarianism can still apply to the 21st century and this therefore proves to the reader that utilitarianism is still relevant to the 21st century. However some readers may believe the writer is wrong because utilitarianism is outdated due to being used for many many years and that the 21st century doesn't need utilitarianism anymore. This has help me understand that whole aspect of utilitarianism and this links into medical ethics that i am currently studying at A/S. E.BA
ReplyDeleteVery helpful post. Thanks a lot. Helps me understand more about Utilitarianism.
ReplyDeleteHappy to find your post. My sister, Kathleen, and I were S.H.M. students in Ferrybank, Waterford in the '50's! Great teachers, great, caring Nuns. (Mary and Kathleen Sheehan)
ReplyDelete