This week saw Britain become the first country in the world to allow the creation of so-called “three-parent” babies with MPs voting overwhelmingly in favour of the technique of mitochondrial donation. However, this milestone in medical science is one of great controversy.
The Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales has condemned the House of Commons decision to vote in favour of legalising three-parent children. Auxiliary Bishop John Sherrington of Westminster stated that the "Three-parent baby law makes human life disposable. " But is he right to suggest this? Will this new law really make human life disposable ?
There is no doubt that this new law will help people's lives. About 2,500 women of child-bearing age in Britain are thought to be at risk of passing on mitochondrial disorders to their children. About one in 6,500 babies is born with a severe form of the disease, which affects vital organs such as the brain, heart and muscles. It is as Ms Ellison told MPs in the commons debate “For many families affected, this is the light at the end of the tunnel”
However, I can understand the point that Bishop Sherrington makes. There is a worry that this new law could lead to a slippery slope of genetically modified “designer babies”. I think that for some there is the perception that soon couples will be designing their children, like they would design a new room, choosing every aspect of their child's genetic makeup. It is important to remember that even though an embryo may not be a fully developed, 9 month old baby, it is still a human life that should be treated as one. As Bishop Sherrington states "The human embryo is a new human life with potential; it should be respected and protected from the moment of conception and not used as disposable material.”
So is Bishop Sherrington right? Will this new law lead us to a slippery slope or will it be the light at the end of the tunnel for so many families ?
VKD
What legislation do you think would need to be put in place? Would it be better to specify in what circumstances this is allowed?
ReplyDeleteSome have suggested this is simply eugenics and simply a way of producing a more 'genetically' superior human race? Do you agree with that?
I think this debate is going to run and run...
A great first blog post!
Great Post! but I would personally argue that this 'Three Parent Baby Law' should not be legalised and brought into action as it will eventually progress and pave the way for 'designing babies' as humans will be able to take genetic control of their own children/embryos and theoretically be able to engineer smarter, stronger and healthier children with selected characteristics like hair and eye colour, I believe this is therefore an unnatural process of procreation as God created 'Adam and Eve' and not 'Adam and Eve and Susan' - Rees-Mogg. However others would argue that by legalising this 'Three Parent Baby Law', this would mean that genes that carry the genetic code for a disease can essentially be removed and replaced with a 'normal' gene/genetic code from a 'Third Parent'. This could then mean that less and less babies will be being born with life threatening or degrading diseases that will effect their quality of life, therefore it can be argued that the 'Three Parent Baby Law' should be legalised.
ReplyDeleteEM B
The Casino site | Lucky Club Lucky Club
ReplyDeleteThe Casino site offers online slots, table games, poker and casino games, and you can also visit the website luckyclub with a mobile app. To stay updated on the