About

This blog is written entirely by Sacred Heart of Mary Girls' School students and run by the RE Department. All students are encouraged to write about a range of topics connected to religion and the media, religion and the news, as well as topics connected to the GCSE and A-Level syllabus. Why not write a contribution? Click here

Thursday 6 February 2014

Is evil and suffering really a challenge to our faith?


Is evil and suffering really a challenge to our faith?
Every single person on this earth, at some point in their lives will have experienced some form evil and suffering. Whether it is the loss of a loved one, or not achieving a mark you revised hard for on a test. Of course, everybody’s situations are different, leaving some people to possibly think, ‘why me and not him/her?’ or ‘what did I do to deserve this?’ however as Theists we know that we are not alone when we are faced with evil and suffering and can always turn to God which can act as a reassurance to us.
However, evil and suffering has been known to be one of the biggest challenges to belief in God and is described as ‘the rock of Atheism’ as it seems to contradict the characteristics we associate with God. When we ask ourselves the question ‘Is there a greater challenge to belief in God than evil?’ we can seem to struggle to find something else that challenges God’s existence this much. Many would say that if God was omnipotent, he should have had the power to create a world in which evil and suffering does not take place. If God was omnibenevolent, shouldn’t he love us too much to put us through the harshness evil can bring to our everyday lives? If God is omniscient, shouldn’t he know evil and suffering was about to take place and therefore stop it? These questions are serious challenges to belief in God as we refer to God as a loving father therefore he shouldn’t put us through suffering.
JL Mackie even produced an ‘inconsistent triad’ which states that we can have two of the following; God’s omnipotence, God’s omnibenevolence or evil and suffering. Considering that we know evil and suffering exists, this would cancel out one of God’s characteristics and if God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent, is he really a God worth worshipping?
Even historic events such as 9/11 seem to work against the existence of God ‘In less than two hours Aquinas’ proofs of God were blasted, seared, choked with arid smoke and snuffed out forever along with more than 3000 lives now reduced to power in the rubble of ground zero’ Ross Mackechnie (a 9/11 survivor) as people could not cope with the idea that a loving God would let this happen and take the lives of so many.
However, I believe that instead of looking at evil and suffering as a challenge to theism, why do we not see it as something that enhances and strengthens our faith?
Using the Free Will Defence, which is taken from the fact both Iraneus’ and Augustine’s theodicies contained the concept that evil came from humans misusing their free will; we can strengthen our belief in God when faced with evil and suffering. Many people think of God as a responsible parent; one who wouldn’t let you stay out until 3am or wouldn’t let you do wreck less things without some form of punishment or lessons learned. I strongly believe that God helps us to learn from our mistakes: We would never touch a hot iron again if when we did the first time we got badly burnt? Or we would never drink heavily again if the first time we did this we got ourselves into a bad state? So it is in fact possible that God allows us to suffer so we can learn lessons and take something positive away from a bad situation. It all comes down to the idea that God does not give us a sheltered life, as we have to grow as people and to do this we must make mistakes.
‘If large scale horrors were not allowed, basically we would have a ‘toy world’ where things matter, but not much. It would be like an over protective parent’ Swinburne.
In response to Swinburne’s idea of a ‘toy world’ which I have to agree with, I believe that our accomplishments in life would not be so great if we didn’t have to suffer a bit for them. Take GCSE and A Level results for example, I know that when I received my GCSE Grades, I was a lot more thankful and happy for myself because I know I worked hard for many months to achieve them. God wants us to grow and develop as humans, not as people who are simply programmed to love him and have no free will, therefore we all experience suffering to actually bring us closer to God. If God created a world in which we were forced to love and obey him, would we really be free? God doesn’t want this sort of life for us; he wants us to grow and appreciate things more when they are not just given to us. Take climbing a mountain for example; would we enjoy the view as much if we didn’t struggle to get there? Would we still find the view breath taking if we flew to the top by helicopter? By allowing us to suffer God can actually give us a greater sense of accomplishment when we do tasks that require hard work and perseverance. God teaches us to work hard for things that we want giving humans a lot more substance that what we would have if things in life were just given to us with no hard work.
However, the Free Will Defence is not an excuse for evil; it simply states why it is there. Evil is not inflicted upon us for no reason. God gave us Free Will so we could choose to either follow him or turn away from him and can make decisions for ourselves with the idea that the wrong decisions teach us lessons; allowing us to grow as people. One can take evil and suffering and use that as a reason to not believe in God, however I think that evil and suffering can actually bring us closer to God and strengthen our relationship with him.
KF.

4 comments:

  1. A very thoughtful response here. You've brought together lots of ideas connected to the problem of evil and linked them to real life experiences. This is vitally important to remember the discussion of evil is not limited to academic debate and is central to lived faith... any discussion of the topic cannot ignore this. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with this post because if evil and suffering did not exist we would not know the consequences of our actions. God cannot stop us from doing things we want to do as he has given us free will, by stopping us from doing things he would be going back on this. This point could also leas us to say that when people are having a difficult time and going through evil and suffering they become closer to God, asking him for help through the situation. This links to the question we had to answer in our essay about questioning God's existence, saying how could God exist if bad things are happening in the world.
    A.N

    ReplyDelete
  3. This post answers the question really well and has some very convincing points on both sides of the argument. However, I still believe that evil and suffering does not bring us closer to God but instead does the opposite. When something bad happens to us we usually question whether God is really there or whether he is listening to our prayers. 9/11 for example, led many to question there faith and ask how God could allow this to happen. Even if this was to teach us a lesson, why would he endanger lives in the process?

    Er.B

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a really thoughtful consideration of both sides of the argument, however whilst I think that the 'toy world' analogy is an extremely useful one, I personally believe that evil and suffering DOES challenge our faith at least sometimes. This is because sometimes in life, bad things happen that do not seem to be a result of any human's bad actions and simply cannot be looked at in a positive light (e.g. "it made us think about our actions" "it made us appreciate good things more") and I think events such as these can definitely challenge our faith. How could a god as omniscient and omnibenevolent as we believe him to be cause us such suffering without adequate reason or cause? C.B

    ReplyDelete